Green cane harvesting reduces energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions by 4% and 16%, respectively, in both regions. Despite higher energy inputs in the irrigated North, greenhouse gas emissions are similar for sugarcane produced in each region. Irrigation contributes to a higher energy input in the irrigated North but differences are mitigated by the lower fertilizer, agro-chemical, and diesel use per ton of sugarcane produced there.
Models were adapted to estimate the impacts of burning prior to harvest, leaving a biomass mulch blanket with green cane harvesting, and increasing the level of mechanization for harvest and other field operations. Regional differences also include terrain, soil, and use of mechanization.
Results were calculated for sugarcane produced in two distinct regions, the irrigated North and the non-irrigated North Coast. A life cycle assessment approach was used to model primary fossil fuel energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of sugarcane in South Africa. The environmental footprint of agricultural production can vary significantly both between countries and within a country based on regional conditions and agricultural practices.
0 kommentar(er)
